Pages





Monday, 20 February 2012

PREPARATION OF STERILE PRODUCTS (INJECTIONS) by LAW JIA JUIN



Author: LAW JIA JUIN

Content of this report:
1.      INTRODUCTION
2.      FORMULA OF OUR PREPARATIONS
3.      CALCULATIONS BEFORE PREPARATION
4.      RESULTS OF PRODUCT  EXAMINATION AND EVALUATION
5.      DISCUSSION
6.      CONCLUSION
7.      REFERENCES USED.
1. INTRODUCTION
This is an article written by me which mainly discuss on the preparation of sterile injection .An injection is a method in which fluid is put into body by the method of infusion, this is usually done via a hollow needle and a syringe which will pierced through the skin to a sufficient depth for the material to be forced into the body. An injection can be of intravenous type, intramuscular type or subcutaneous type. All injections share some common characteristics which are good sterility, free from microorganisms, free of external impurities and particles, free of pyrogens as well as endotoxin (or consist only the minimum acceptable amount)and should be kept in a well -sealed glass container to prevent contamination or leakage.  .Since these properties are important for the patient and have a direct effect on the tolerance of patient towards the injection, thus they are usually tested after the preparation of injections. The injection products are tested and evaluated from four aspects which are, sterility of product, clarity of product, leakage testing, and last but not least the endotoxin testing. In our practical ,we tested the leakage test , then follow by the clarity test, third sterility test, and lastly we tested the endotoxic test. The purposes and methods of these evaluations will be discussed later by me. The calculations we used before the preparations are also given by me.

2.         FORMULA OF OUR PREPARATIONS
Dextrose injection B.P
Anhydrous dextrose 
5.0g
Water for injection to            
100ml



Lignocaine HCL Injection B.P        
Lignocaine HCL
2.0g
Sodium chloride         
q.s
Water for injection to
100ml

     Lactated Ringer’s injection B.P           
Sodium chloride     
600mg
Sodium lactate           
320mg
Potassium Chloride 
40mg
Calcium Chloride    
27mg
Water for injection to     
100ml

3.CALCULATION WE DID BEFORE PREPARING OUR RESPECTIVE INJECTIONS SOLUTIONS
1. Concentration of anhydrous dextrose
W=0.3M/N
M=180     N=1 (because dextrose is an organic substances with no charge)
W=0.3x 180 =54g/l =5.4g/100ml= 5.4%w/v          BP specification =5%w/v
Therefore w is acceptable. And 5.4g of anhydrous dextrose powder should be dissolved in sterile water and made up to 100ml solution using a volumetric flask.
2.Concentration of NaCl required to make lignocaine HCl injection isometric with blood plasma.
[0.52- (a x % of drug solution)] / b
a= Freezing point of 1 % w/v lignocaine =0.13 o C       
b= Freezing point of 1 % w/v NaCl= -0.576
[0.52-(0.13 x 2)] / (0.576)
=45mg/100ml
45 mg of NaCl solids should be weighed, dissolved and made up to 100ml of lignocaine HCl solution, making the lignocaine HCl solution isometric to human blood plasma.

3. Combined effective molar concentration (EMC ) of ringer lactated solution.
1.NaCl
NaCl= 600mg/100ml= 6g/l
W=(C x M) /N           W=6g/l      M=58.2 g          N=2
C= (6 x 2)/ 58.5= 0.205 M ……….(A)
2.Lactate
Solution lactate =320mg/100ml= 3.2g/l, thus W =3.2g/l
W=(C x M) /N          
3.2= (C x 112.07)/2
C=0.05710 M …………(B)
Using the same formula ,W=(C x M) /N ,  and the values of M and C provided we can actually calculate for the C value of KCl and CaCl2:
3, KCl= 0.01073M………(C)
4, CaCl2= 0.00723M……..(D)
EMC= A+ B+ C+ D =0.28018 =0.3 M
Concentartion of NaCl for iso-osmotic solution
= W=(C x M) /N           M=58.5 which is the molecular weight of NaCl ;N=2 (charge of Na plus charge of Cl)
=[0.3 x 58.5]/ 2
= 8.775g/l =0.8775g/100ml  =0.9g/100ml= 0.9%w/v
4. RESULTS WE GET AFTER EVALUATING OUR GROUP’S PRODUCT, DEXTROSE INJECTION BP
A)    CLARITY TEST
OBSERVATION: The injection solution we prepared last week is clear and free from external contaminants and particles when observed under the light with both black and white backgrounds.
LEAKAGE TEST       

B)   
 OBSERVATION: There is no red dye moving into our injection solution, showing us that the glass container holding our injection solution is well sealed.
C)    STERILTY TESTING
OBSERVATIONS:
TEST TUBE 1 (nutrient medium with product): no turbidity showing that there is no growth of microorganism the injection product is well sterile
TEST TUBE 2 (nutrient medium with with product): no turbidity showing that there is no growth of microorganism the injection product is well sterile.
CONTROL TUBE (nutrient medium with without product): no turbidity

D)    BACTERIAL ENDOTOXIN TEST.
OBSERVATIONS:
PPC TUBE: Clot is formed
SPL TUBE: No clot formed
5. DISCUSSION
                            Right after the injection solution is produced and packed inside a glass container which is then sealed, we checked the clarity of our injection solution, this is because every strict and good manufacturing practice requires a visual inspection of each ampoule individually, this is usually done with our naked eyes. If any visible particles are spotted in our container, we should actually discard the product, this is because contamination is said to be occurred during the process of manufacturing. This inspection should be done with human inspectors under a condition of good light source, and is usually done against a black and white background. In our examination we found out that the dextrose solution we prepared is totally clear of any particles. The solution is transparent and clear, showing that our product had passed the clarity test.
                            In the leakage test, the sealed-glass container which holding  our dextrose solution is put inside a permeable bag with marbles inside it, then the whole bag is immersed into a basin containing red dyes. The permeable bag containing the injection sealed glass container is allow to be immersed in the dye for 5 minutes, after that it is taken out for examination. If let say, the transparent injection solution in the sealed container is contaminated with the red dye, then our product is said to be failed from leak test, and it had to be discarded, an improper sealed container is unacceptable because this can allow the outer air, microorganisms, dusts, and contaminants to get into our container, contaminating our injection solution, making it harmful and unacceptable to our patient. Beside that improper sealed container also allow our injection solution to leak out, changing the desired dose for injection. Since there is no red dye found inside our injection product ,we can deduce that our container is well sealed .The injection solution is well kept and protected from contamination, the product passed this test.
                            The third test we did for our dextrose solution quality examination is sterility test. Before conducting this test, the neck of sealed glass container was craved with knife for easier gripping of the white cap breaker, the top sealed neck of glass container then was broken by using the white cap breaker stated. Tube-dilution method is applied in this test and the medium we used was thioglycollate medium. Two drops of our injection solution was transferred to two test tubes each with a suitable medium in which it provides optimum conditions for bacterial growth and incubate at a suitable temperature (37oC) for sufficient time (24 hours). The transfers of sample solution are done under an aseptic condition inside a turbulence air flow chambers ,this is to ensure an accurate result and to prevent false positive result. A control is also prepared with medium but no injection solution inside. If the medium turns to become turbid then we can deduce that our injection product is contaminated or susceptible to bacterial growth. If there is no turbidity in the medium the preparation may be sterile. Since there are no turbidity observed in all the 3 test tubes, we can say that our injection solution is free from the contamination of microorganisms and again we can conclude that our product passed this sterility test.
                            In endotoxin test, 0.5ml of injection solution was transferred into a sample tube (SPL tube) using pipette, then we gently swirled the SPL tube for proper mixture of the content. After that we used the same pipette to transfer 0.25ml of solution from the SPL tube to positive product control tube(PPC tube). Upon proper transfer we swirled the PPC tube gently and immediately placed both the tubes into an incubator with temperature 37 degree celcius for 1 day. If both tubes clot, then we will had rejected the product because the injection solution is said to contain more than 0.25 EU/ml of endotoxin. If the control PPC tube did not clot then we will had repeated the test because the result is invalid. But in in our case ,the clot formed in PPC tube but did not formed in SPL tube ,thus we concluded that the endotoxin level in our injection solution is less that 0.25EU/ml, we is acceptable, our product passed this test.
6.Conclusion
 : Our product which is the ,dextrose injection solution BP, passed all the 4 tests ( clarity, leakage, sterility and endotoxin test). We concluded that this is a well prepared injection solution with proper sterility and perfect seal as well as ideal packing.
7.References
1.      Wikipedia.com.my
2.      Elearning.imu.edu.my
3.      Pharmaceutics-info.com.my













Thursday, 2 February 2012

Tablet production and in process quality control part1 IPQC1 BY LAW JIA JUIN



BY LAW JIA JUIN
Contents of this article
A.    Introduction
B.     Apparatus, materials and procedures
C.    Readings, results and calculation
D.    Discussion
E.     Conclusion
F.     references

A)    INTRODUCTION
Last week my group members and I learnt to use the tabletting machine and spraying kit.
In this report I am discussing on the 1)mechanism of tablet formation,    2) the tableting and spraying machine that we used and also     3)the In Process Quality Control (IQC). Besides that I also bring out the    4)problem faced during tableting, the causes and     5)the remedies to overcome them
Tablet formation is done through compression. Compression is a process in which a force is applied to pack the powders together and reducing the volume of solid particles so that they may be confined within a small limited space. What happens during compression is, energy applied forces particles into close proximity to each other this enables the particles to cohere into porous, solid specimen of defined geometry. The tableting process is sometimes known as “compaction cycle” and can be divided into three stages namely die filling, tablet formation and tablet ejection.
What happens in die filling is the gravitational forces will cause the flow of the powder from a hopper into the die. But before this the die is closed at its lower end by the lower punch. Sometimes the centrifugal forces is also applied to fill the die.
The second step is tablet formation , in which the upper punch is lowered down and enters the die compartment ,the powders filled is compressed until a solid tablet is formed. In this stage the lower punch can be stationary or moving upward. After the maximum force is applied, the upper punch leaves the powder/tablet by moving upward, at the same time the lower punch is also moving upward.
The lower punch rises up until its’ tip reaches the top of the die compartment .The tablet is thus pushed and ejected out from the die compartment. This is called tablet ejection stage.
During tablet formation, the powder particles are repacked, deformed and fractured. In repacking process the powders are rearranged and packed closer, the space between small particles are reduced. There are two types of  deformation, the deformation can be elastic deformation or plastic deformation. Elastic deformation is reversible, which means that the tablet form is subjected to expansion upon removal of upper punch
In plastic deformation the forces of compression is larger than the elastic limit (yield value) leading to irreversible deformation or a deformation not immediately reversible upon removal of the applied force.
In some cases ,fracture of powders particles can occur especially for those brittle powders this is known as “brittle fracture”,  the smaller fragments formed can fill into air spaces between larger granules,  leading to bulk volume reduction.
 There are two types of tabletting machine  ,which are single punch press and rotator press. The single punch press is usually used for small scale production or for standardization and sample testing before a mass production. The rotary press is also referred as multiplication  press was developed to increase the output of tablets. The primary use of this machine is thus during scale up in the latter part of the formulation  work and during large scale up production. These are what we used last week. 


Rotary press                                   single punch press
The tablets formed were coated and coloured by using a dye sprayer.The spraying specification are shown below:

Spray cycle:                                                             Spray 30 sec stop 30 second
Spraying air pressure:                                              2.7 kg/cm2
Dry air Temperature                                                60 0C
Coating Pan Speed                                                            8-10 rpm
Spraying method                                                     Spraying gun                       
These condition must be fulfilled in order to optimize the coating. The sprayer consist of a controller, round rotating compartment, a sprayer with pump, dye reservoir and a hot air pipe for drying.


The in process quality control IPQC is a set of operational techniques and activities taken based on the quality assurance system in order to make sure that all the criteria and requirements have been fulfilled, and the quality of product stated is verified. So why should we carry out this IPQC? The purpose of this IPQC is to adjust ,correct and optimize the parameters within an operating range. IPQC is also carried out so that we are able to inspect the quality of a finished product this is to determine whether the product is acceptable, otherwise the criteria of production are modified before mass production, this can prevent wastage of resources. The screening is done during the production not after the completion of products.
There are four IPQC that we had done last week, which were hardness, friability, weight variation, and disintegration time. I am going to introduce the definition of them as well as their method of assessments under the DISCUSSION part.
B)    APPARUTUS  ,MATERIALS AND PROCEDURES
<AS WRITTEN IN PRACTICAL MANUAL>






C)    RESULTS  ,READINGS and CALCULATION of our EXPERIMENT
Formulation of our tablets
Ingredients
Amount (mg)
Calculate for 500 tablets (g)
Paracetamol
150
75
Starch
2
1
Methyl Cellulose
50
25
Talc
5
2.5
Magnesium stearate
5
2.5
Weight per tablet= 212mg
1.      Hardness :2.8 kg/cm2
2.      Friability : 0.5%
3.      Disintegration : 8 minutes
4.      Weight variation :
Tablet Number
Weight of individual Tablet(gm)
Weight Variation (%)
1
0.1976
+/-3.37
2
0.2070
+/-1.22
3
0.2068
+/-1.22
4
0.2064
+/-0.92
5
0.2072
+/-1.32
6
0.2133
+/-4.30
7
0.2060
+/-0.73
8
0.2048
+/-0.15
9
0.2011
+/-1.66
10
0.2003
+/-0.59
11
0.1916
+/-6.31
12
0.1977
+/-3.33
13
0.2163
+/-5.77
14
0.2049
+/-0.20
15
0.1993
+/-2.54
16
0.2050
+/-0.24
17
0.2051
+/-0.29
18
0.2045
+/-0.00
19
0.2070
+/-1.22
20
0.2071
+/-1.27
Average weight
4.089/20=0.2045(percentage diff should be +/-7.5)

Number of tablets outside the limits
None, all are within +/- 7.5
Batch passes or fails ?
Passes

    



 D) DISCUSSION
There are four IPQC that we had done last week, which were hardness, friability, weight variation, and disintegration time.
Hardness is also known as crushing strength, it is an assessment on the resistance of the tablet to chipping, abrasion, or breakage under the presence of external factors eg forces and heat energy during manufacture, storage, transportation, and handling.
The hardness is dependent on the compression force, die fill, lubricant used, binder used and also the setting of tableting machine. The control of hardness is critical this is because the disintegration and dissolution of tablet is dependent on the hardness of tablets. Besides that, an optimum hardness also enable proper storing and handling of tablets.
The hardness tester used by us during the process of tablet formation is known as stokes-Monsanto , which works by compression force. Before we start using it the reading is adjusted to zero. This is done by placing the tablet in the jaw with help of index finger and thumb of left hand The screw is then rotated clockwise so that the tester itself can hold the tablet. After this adjustment the tester is ready to use. Place a sample tablet and compress it until it break , the reading(kg/cm2) on the tester give us the hardness of tablet.  This test was repeated on minimum 10 tablets and the average of was taken as the hardness of this batch. Oral tablets normally have a hardness of 4 to 8 or 10 kg/cm2.
Next I am going to introduce the second IPQC that I did. Friability is defined as the percentage of weight lost by the tablets due to mechanical action eg abrasion and friction. Both abrasion and friction caused tablets to chip, cap ,break or crack slightly. The weight loss due to abrasion and friction is calculated using the initial weight minus the final weight. In our experiment 20 tablets were weighed and placed in Roche Friabilator. This Roche friabilator then was switched on and started to rotated, it induced abrasion and friction to the tablets ,the tablets underwent shock as they fell 6 inches upon each rotation. The friabilty was then calculated by :
(initial weight of 20 tablets- final weight of 20 tablets)/ initial weight of 20 tablets
According to British Pharmacopeia ,tablets should not lose more than 1% of their total weight (BP,USP). Otherwise adjustment is needed.
            The third IPQC test is disintegration time. The apparatus used for disintegration testing is known as Basket-rack assembly. It consist of 6 open ended transparent tubes each 7.7±0.25 cm long and having inside diameter 21.5 mm. Six tablets are placed into basket-rack assembly and connected to the disintegration apparatus. 6 tablets were placed into basket-rack assembly and connected to the disintegration apparatus. Apparatus and timer were started simultaneously. All of the tablets were let inside the water for complete disintegration .All the tablets need to disintegrated completely before the timer was stopped. If 1 or 2 tablets fail to disintegrate completely repeat the test on 12 additional tablets. The time of complete disintegration should be less than 30 min, this is because the tablets are coated before this test was carried out.
            The last IPQC test I am discussing here is weight variation.
Weight variation %=< (average weight-weight of individual tablet)/average weight> x 100%
The smaller the weight variation means that the tablet formation is uniform during compression, this also tell us that the dose of each tablet are standardized. The average weights of our tablets are 204.5mg which is between 130mg and 324mg, so the percentage of weight variation should be +/- 7.5.
In our experiment, the hardness is 2.8kg/cm2 . This is too low, outside the optimum range (4 to 8 or 10 kg/cm2). This may be due to incomplete compression , and can be overcome by adjusting the compressing machine to increase the hardness of tablets. In our experiment we also saw that tablets formed underwent some problem like chipping. Chipping is defined as the breaking of tablet edges, while the tablets are leaving the press or during subsequent handling and coating operation. This can be a direct effect of granules which are too dry and I suggested that hygroscopic binder and water should be added into the formulation to slightly moisten up the granules. Besides that we also saw colour variation on a few tablets right after coating by sprayer. This might be due to the migration of soluble dyes plasticizer or uneven spraying. And I suggested that a different plasticizer and mild drying condition should be applied to overcome this problem. Beside that the spraying condition should be properly monitored to address this problem. The rough and hard granules  are due to the mistake that we did in the previous practical, since we added talc and magnesium stearate into the powders before adding the binder. This is a human error and can be avoided the next time, since we learnt from mistake.
E)    CONCLUSION
1.      Weight per tablet= 212mg
2.      Hardness :2.8 kg/cm2
3.      Friability : 0.5%
4.      Disintegration : 8 minutes
5.      Weight variation is acceptable and within the range of +/-7.5
6.      Hardness of our tablets can be improved by adjusting the compression strength of the punches of tabletting machine
F)     REFERENCES
1.      Wikipedia.com.my
2.      Elearning.imu.edu.my
3.      Pharmaceutics-info.com.my
THANK YOU